michael.heier/jellyfin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Correct the final round of spelling mistakes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Joshua Boniface 2018-08-09 02:33:19 -04:00 committed by Vasily
parent 6d05460e34
commit c71115bddf
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
README.md
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Emby Server
Emby Server is a personal media server with apps on just about every device. Emby Server is a personal media server with apps on just about every device.
It features a REST-based API with built-in documention to facilitate client development. We also have client libraries for our API to enable rapid development. It features a REST-based API with built-in documentation to facilitate client development. We also have client libraries for our API to enable rapid development.
This repository is a hard fork of Emby 3.4.1.18 which unlocks Premium status by default and includes a buildable source repository for Debian and other package types. This repository is a hard fork of Emby 3.4.1.18 which unlocks Premium status by default and includes a buildable source repository for Debian and other package types.
@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ In 2015, I and a number of other users requested LDAP support for Emby. I had be
Emby continued to operate and update as it did until 2017. During this time however the Emby team began taking various extensions, as well as all mobile apps, out of their public repositories. I'm at this point still unsure of their status. This raised suspicion on my part but alone is legitimate. However in light of future events it certainly appears part of a pattern. The LDAP issue in particular also lingered, with numerous delays due to seemingly unrelated code changes and a number of noncommittal responses from the developers as to the status of the feature. Emby continued to operate and update as it did until 2017. During this time however the Emby team began taking various extensions, as well as all mobile apps, out of their public repositories. I'm at this point still unsure of their status. This raised suspicion on my part but alone is legitimate. However in light of future events it certainly appears part of a pattern. The LDAP issue in particular also lingered, with numerous delays due to seemingly unrelated code changes and a number of noncommittal responses from the developers as to the status of the feature.
In the early part of 2017, the core developers added a nag screen. While the details are disputed, what I can say for certain is that for at least one minor version release, I was experencing a 10 second nagscreen prompting me to purchase a Premium licencs, before *almost every* video I watched. The developers had intended this to be once every 24 hours, but in either case I was extremely dissapointed in this obviously-user-hostile "feature". Further investigation into the Emby user forums as well as Github showed an extremely stark and, to me, chilling attitude from the core developers and the premium-paid community: an attitude that the developers can and should be making money off of Emby, a GPL project that, to my knowledge, was gifted to the current developers under this license in the past, by any means necessary; and a hostile contempt towards any user who dared criticize this decision (specifically new users, non-premium, who were testing Emby or who had no desire for the Premium features). In the early part of 2017, the core developers added a nag screen. While the details are disputed, what I can say for certain is that for at least one minor version release, I was experiencing a 10 second nagscreen prompting me to purchase a Premium licence, before *almost every* video I watched. The developers had intended this to be once every 24 hours, but in either case I was extremely disappointed in this obviously-user-hostile "feature". Further investigation into the Emby user forums as well as GitHub showed an extremely stark and, to me, chilling attitude from the core developers and the premium-paid community: an attitude that the developers can and should be making money off of Emby, a GPL project that, to my knowledge, was gifted to the current developers under this license in the past, by any means necessary; and a hostile contempt towards any user who dared criticize this decision (specifically new users, non-premium, who were testing Emby or who had no desire for the Premium features).
This attitude was further demonstrated in the response to the issue on GitHub, where the devlopers appeared openly hostile to any criticism, though without the echo-chamber of the user forums to police the critics. The nagscreen was eventually removed, however the stain of this behaviour and attitude remained apparent. This attitude was further demonstrated in the response to the issue on GitHub, where the developers appeared openly hostile to any criticism, though without the echo-chamber of the user forums to police the critics. The nagscreen was eventually removed, however the stain of this behaviour and attitude remained apparent.
In late 2017, it was then discovered that there were possible violations of the GPL license within the projects main repository. Specifically, a number of binary-only DLL files to which no source was provided and that the project would not build without; these files are at this time sill present in this repository as well. There was further hostility and outright evasiveness on the part of the lead developer to answering simple questions regarding the license status of these components, with delayed, terse, and noncommittal answers. In late 2017, it was then discovered that there were possible violations of the GPL license within the projects main repository. Specifically, a number of binary-only DLL files to which no source was provided and that the project would not build without; these files are at this time sill present in this repository as well. There was further hostility and outright evasiveness on the part of the lead developer to answering simple questions regarding the license status of these components, with delayed, terse, and noncommittal answers.
At long last earlier this year, the LDAP feature was released - as a Premium-only plugin. And issues of source control and user builds finally came to a head with the 3.5.0 version, which split several components of the source package into separate repositories. Public access to these repositories was not granted for some time, with further noncommittal and evasive answers from the Emby developers, preventing users from building this release. While this situation was eventually rectified, for me this was the last straw. At long last earlier this year, the LDAP feature was released - as a Premium-only plugin. And issues of source control and user builds finally came to a head with the 3.5.0 version, which split several components of the source package into separate repositories. Public access to these repositories was not granted for some time, with further noncommittal and evasive answers from the Emby developers, preventing users from building this release. While this situation was eventually rectified, for me this was the last straw.
In light of these actions, I beleve that the core Emby developers do not respect the Free Software community that their project implies it is a part of, nor do they respect their gratis users. The developers seek to monitize this project, as is their right, but their methods are overbearing, arbitrary, and demonstrate contempt for users who choose them because they are a Free Software project, including package maintainers and contributors, while outright demanding via extortion payment for their product. For these reasons, I do not believe they are good stewarts of the project, and this fork seeks to build an alternative to them in the Free Software space, while declaring to always remain both gratis and libre and respect its community. In light of these actions, I believe that the core Emby developers do not respect the Free Software community that their project implies it is a part of, nor do they respect their gratis users. The developers seek to monetize this project, as is their right, but their methods are overbearing, arbitrary, and demonstrate contempt for users who choose them because they are a Free Software project, including package maintainers and contributors, while outright demanding via extortion payment for their product. For these reasons, I do not believe they are good stewards of the project, and this fork seeks to build an alternative to them in the Free Software space, while declaring to always remain both gratis and libre and respect its community.
I welcome any feedback, forks, or pull requests. I welcome any feedback, forks, or pull requests.